If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Is There Another Unobservable Law that Counters the Law of Entropy?

In an attempt to preserve their presuppositions, evolutionists use convoluted thinking to deal with this flaw in evolutionism; contrary to logic, evolutionists claim that there is another law that works exactly opposite the law of entropy. Although this fictitious law cannot be observed anywhere, evolutionists claim that it must exist because the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication proves its existence. What?  These folks are trying to use an untestable fable to prove evolution. That is exactly what you must try to do if you are going to be an evolutionist. Here's what you must do: you have to try to use evolution to prove evolution. Of course, you and I know that a theory cannot be used to prove anything, but some people can be confused if you phrase it just right. You just have to find ways to hide the fact that you are using circular reasoning, don't you?

How can people live their lives believing in presuppositions that are just simple-minded assumptions? These assumpitons are used as filters and as a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.