click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

Logical Fallacy of Question-Begging Epithet

 

Logical Fallacy of Question-Begging Epithet

Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma which is simply the fact that the foundation of all human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or bare assertions without any evidence. Question-begging epithet, a form of circular reasoning, is one of these three unhappy possibilities.

The logical fallacy of the question-begging epithet occurs when biased, often emotional, language is used to persuade rather than logic. To be question-begging, it must presuppose the thing that it is trying to support or prove. Question-begging epithets are attempts to stir emotions in order to distract people's attention from the meat of the logic--especially when playing to the crowd. Question-begging epithets can include claims with no support for the claims, rhetoric, empty words, or any remarks without substance. The other part of the problem is that the entire communication is based on circular reasoning or question-begging.

Examples of the Fallacy of Question-Begging Epithet

Vulgarity, yelling, sarcasm, and name-calling are all examples of question-begging epithets. Note that there is no real information contained in these fallacies.

"Amazing! I gave you the actual paper of Mary Schwarzer. Add "logical fallacy" to the list of terms you don't understand."

Note that this is not only an example of the fallacy of question-begging epithet, but it is also an example of the logical fallacy of appeal to authority. This is in response to a statement that there was a logical fallacy in Mary Schwarzer's paper.

"You said, 'Revelation is the only solid basis for sound reasoning.' That is precious! And I have confirmation bias? WOW!"

This was brought as a refutation, but it doesn't refute anything. The statement that it was designed to supposedly refute was, "Revelation is the only solid basis for sound reasoning" However, the writer didn't bother to say why he thinks that this is invalid and just gives this hysterical remark. Note that this followed a previous example of confirmation bias that the same skeptic gave. Part of this response is the logical fallacy of Tu Quoque / You Too. But, getting back to the logical fallacy of question-begging epithet, in the statement, "Revelation is the only solid basis for sound reasoning," where is the confirmation bias?

"The University has been invaded by creationists."

"Christians are weak and stupid."

"Evolution vs. creationism"

"The Creation 'Museum' isn't about science at all, but is entirely about a peculiar, quirky, very specific interpretation of the Bible."

"You're committing a fallacy"

When you ask what the fallacy is, you get no answer, but they change the subject.

"Creationism is not science."

This is another example of using biased language instead of reason to persuade. The "ism" attached to creation is usually not equally attached to evolution-ism. In addition, just making a rule of naturalism/Atheism as the basis of science is begging the question. It is assuming, by definition of the word, science, the very issue at hand. That is circular reasoning with a bit of biased language added just for spin.

"Total lack of science...."

The very short remark was made in a comparison of revelation as opposed to made up stories like evolution. This begs the question by assuming that science, probably meaning science based on atheism/naturalism/materialism, is the best way to understand origins of the Heavens and the Earth. Since that is the very point of discussion, it is circular reasoning to use the assumption of the point one is trying to make as the premise. This short remark is packed with many fallacies, partly because it states nothing explicitly: the fallacy of question-begging epithet, the fallacy of the unsupported presupposition, the fallacy of appeal to ridicule, and the logical fallacy of equivocation on the word, science.



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2014
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies     >   Fallacies of Circular Reasoning     >   Question-Begging Epithet

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

Logical Fallacy of Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning

Circular Generalization Fallacy

Logical Fallacy of Begging the Question / Vicious Circle / Chicken And Egg Argument

Logical Fallacy of Circular Reference

Logical Fallacy of Question Begging Analogy

Logical Fallacy of Question-Begging Epithet

Logical Fallacy of Question-Begging Complex Question / Framing Fallacy / Loaded Question / Not Understanding the Problem / Defining the Problem Incorrectly / Trick Question / Multiple Question / Plurium Interrogationum / Fallacy of Many Questions:

Logical Fallacy of Circular Cause and Consequence

Logical Fallacy of Question-Begging Rejection of Faith

Self-Referential Fallacy

"It Ought To Be True, So It Is" Fallacy


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness