click here to learn more about being redeemed from sin and set free to serve God in spirit and in truth. click here to learn more about holiness click here to learn more about being changed into the same image click here to learn more about sowing and reaping click here to learn more about the free gift of righteousness. click here to learn more about how faith gives us access to grace and grace does the works. click here to learn more about faith and how it comes. click here to learn more about acknowledging Jesus click here to learn more about how God speaks Who will you listen to?  Click here to learn more. click here to learn more about the pattern of God. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for individuals, marriage, and family. click here to learn more about the pattern of God for the local church click here to learn more about the Church universal
 
SeekFind Logo Menu

Propositional Fallacy

 

Propositional Fallacy

Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known; however, that is not true. Without Divine revelation, neither logic nor math can be known. Science is limited only to pragmatic thinking because of the weakness of human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The propositional fallacy, a form of axiomatic thinking, is one of these three unhappy possibilities.

The Propositional Fallacy occurs when an error is made in a compound proposition. A proposition is a truth claim statement. A compound proposition makes more than one claim but joins the claims into a single claim using any of the following: Conjunction ("or"), Disjunction ("or"), Negation ("not"), Conditional ("only if"), or Biconditional ("if and only if"). If the truth values that are proposed are not consistent with the joining words, then the propositional fallacy has been committed. Affirming the disjunct, affirming the consequent, and denying the antecedent are all propositional fallacies.

Examples of the Propositional Fallacy

"Science is important, and evolution is science."

Science is important. The first proposition might be true. How is science being defined? Why is it important? How can we know that it's important?

Evolution is science. How are we defining evolution. How are we defining science in the second proposition? Why is evolution science? How can we know that evoluton is science?

"By observing, experimenting, designing, testing, and building, we have been able to make cellphones, computers, airplanes, and many other things, and we have also observed molecule-to-man evolution."

The first proposition is true. The second is false. The word, "and," is fallacious and negates the entire compound statement. This is a propositional fallacy.

"By observing, experimenting, designing, testing, and building, we have been able to make cellphones, computers, airplanes, and many other things, and changes have been observed from generation to generation resulting in new species."

This is not a fallacy. Both propositions are true.

Bill Nye arguing against Creation science: "If we continue to eschew science, eschew the process, and try to divide science into observational science and historic science, we are not going to move forward, we’ll not embrace natural laws, we’ll not make discoveries, we’ll not invent and innovate and stay ahead."

Bill is implying that there is some sort of relationship between eschewing the process of science and knowing the difference between an observation and an assumption. He is implying that, if you know the difference between and observation and an assumption, then you are eschewing (shunning or renouncing) the process of science. So, if you know the difference between making things up and observing things, then you are shunning science? that appears to be the statement.

Note that Bill's statement is not a syllogism, so this fallacy looks a bit different when compared to the first examples. Most of the time, syllogisms are not stated clearly. This one has a lot of complexity to it. There is a lot to analyze, and most people won't take the time. That's why lies work.

Is there any piece of technology that requires the lack of ability to discern between assumptions and observation? Is there something useful that could only be developed if the developer can’t tell the difference between made-up stuff and scientific observation? Bill has implied that knowing the difference between observational and historic science is the same thing as eschewing science and the scientific process. To state this another way, Bill is saying that if a student can recognize the difference between made-up stuff and actual observation and real logic, this is the same as the student shunning science and the process of carefully observing and recording facts. Historical science requires made-up stories and made-up assumptions. Revelation requires none of these. In the case of the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man sacred cow story, it also allows all sorts of logical fallacies. This, of course, is an assertion contrary to fact.

 



Author/Compiler
Last updated: Sep, 2014
 
 




Bread Crumbs

 
Home     >   Meaning     >   Christian Witness     >   Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies     >   Presumptions, Bare Assertions, and Lies     >   Propositional Fallacy

Main

Foundations

Home

Meaning

Bible

Dictionary

History

Toons & Vids

Quotations

Similar

Logical Fallacy of Ipse dixit /Just Because Fallacy / Trust Me / Mother Knows Best Fallacy / Because I Said So / You'll See

Logical Fallacy of Unsupported Assertion / Alleged Certainty / Appeal to Common Sense / Bare Assertion Fallacy / Unprovable Statement / Groundless Claim

Secret Knowledge Fallacy

Allness Fallacy

Autistic Certainty Fallacy

Logical Fallacy of Assertion Contrary to Fact / Counterfactual Fallacy / Lie / Untruth

Big Lie Technique / Staying on Message

Logical Fallacy of the Outright Lie / Total Lie

Logical Fallacy of the Bold-Faced Lie / Bald-Faced Lie

Appeal to Confidence

Logical Fallacy of Hypothesis Contrary to Fact / Argumentum Ad Speculum / speculative fallacy /

Logical Fallacy of False Prophecy

Argument to the Future / Escape to the Future

Escape Via Ignorance

Logical Fallacy of Argumentum Ex Culo

Logical Fallacy of Blind Obedience / Blind Authority / Team Player

Logical Fallacy of False Accusation / Finding a Fault Where None Exists / False Conflict / False Error

Argument from Omniscience

Logical Fallacy of Universal Negative

As Far As Anyone Knows Fallacy

Proving a Negative Fallacy / Negative Proof Fallacy

Claim of Unknowables Fallacy

The Logical Fallacy of Presupposition/Assumptive Thinking

Irrelevant Purpose Fallacy

Propositional Fallacy

Thompson Invisibility Syndrome

Logical Fallacy of Presumption

Grammatical Presupposition / Assumptive Language

Arbitrary Thinking

Reversible Logic

Floating Abstraction Fallacy

Logical Fallacy of Proof by Implied Unsupported Assertion / Implied Lie

Spiritual Fallacy / Spiritual Excuse

I Wish I Had a Magic Wand Fallacy / Feigned Powerlessness

Pious Fraud

Logical Fallacy of False Open-Mindedness


Recent

Home

Answer to Critic

Appeal to Possibility

Circular Reasoning

Argument to the Future

Insignificant Cause

Word Magic

Love Between a Man and Woman

Author/Compiler

Colossians 2

Righteousness & Holiness

Don't Compromise

Sin

Proof by Atheism

Scriptures About Marriage

Genuine Authority

The Reason for Rejecting Truth

Witness on the Internet

Flaky Human Reasoning

How Do You Know?



Featured


The Real Purpose of the Church

The Real Purpose of Life

From Glory to Glory

REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT

REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT

How to be Led by God

How to Witness

Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality

Holiness & Mind/Soul

Redemption: Free From Sin

Real Reality

Stories Versus Revelation

Understanding Logic

Logical Fallacies

Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?

How Can We Know Anything?

God's Word

God's Process

God's Pattern

Mind Designed to Relate to God

Answers for the Confused

Fossil Record Says: "Creation"

Avoid These Pitfalls

Public School's Religion

Twisting Science

Evolutionism

Public School Failures

Twisting History


How can we know anything about anything? That's the real question

more info: mouseover or click

The complexity of Gods Way understood in a single diagram
Obey your flesh and descend into darkness