The Atheists, and those who believe Atheistic dogmas, claim that all they need to do is to prove that science could explain everything we needed to know without reference to God. If science is equivalent to story-telling this might have been true, except that we now know that scientific-sounding-story-telling cannot explain everything without violating several basic laws of science. They claim to base everything on logic and evidence, but this is far from the case.
The reality is that the Atheists, and those who believe Atheistic dogmas, actually need to do a lot more than to prove that science could explain everything we needed to know without reference to God. They need to show proof that their stories have actually taken place, which they have not been able to do. They must show proof that God does not exist, which they have not been able to do. They have to show proof, using something besides circular reasoning, arguments from ignorance, universal negatives, and other irrational arguments, that followers of Christ are not actually hearing His Voice and being filled with His Spirit and having Him do His works through them.
Blunders in Reasoning by Evolutionists - Dr. Jason Lisle - Origins
Ultimate Proof - Dr. Jason Lisle on Origins
Statistical Impossibility of Evolution | Origins with Ralph Muncaster
