|"If God Exists" Fallacy|
"If God Exists" Fallacy
The "if God exists" fallacy is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma.
The "If God exists" fallacy occurs when logic similar to this is used, "If the all powerful and benevolent God defined in the Bible exists, then He wouldn't allow _____. However, _____ exists. Therefore, God does not exist. The form of this argument is valid, but the two premises are not. A simple question will test both the major and minor premises and show that they are not known. "How do you know?" The answer is, "I made it up." What is common to all of these is that the person using the fallacy assumes that he or she is all-knowing. They make statements about goodness, evil, what God would or should do, and the nature of spiritual and physical reality. These statements often make implied claims about what God is doing or accomplishing through His Creation and what the ultimate end is. These statements are all in the realm that is beyond what human beings can know except by divine revelation. Since the statements are designed to try to explain away the Almighty, divine revelation would be self-refuting if claimed.
Agrippa's Trilemma eliminates any possibility of logically analyzing what God would do or anything else about God. In fact, it eliminates that possibility of analyzing logic or science. Fortunately, Agrippa's Trilemma only affects those who refuse to acknowledge God.
Examples of the "If God Exists" Fallacy
How does Leibniz think that he knows that God didn't choose the best in creating this world? What inside track does Leibniz have to understand the nature of the reality outside of the confines of time and space? Perhaps, it may be that Leibniz didn't understand the difference between power, authority, and spiritual reality. Perhaps, if Leibniz had all power, he thinks that he could have done it more efficiently than God. The question remains, how does he think that he knows this? The answer is obvious. It is the same answer that must be given to every anti-God, anti-Christ, and anti-Bible claim. The way people manufacture such "knowledge" is through arbitrary assumptions, made-up stories, irrational thinking, or outright lies.
People who make this type of claim assume that they know the end of the work that God is doing. They assume that God is not patient enough to do something that takes many ages, each of which is a day to God. They assume that God could have done it another way, that there is not something in the nature of spiritual reality that makes God's way the very best way that things could have been done to achieve God's final desired result.
Again, the question is, "How does this person know?" They have made three bazaar claims. How do they know that these three claims are true. In fact, they are assertions contrary to fact. People who make these kinds of claims think that they have far more knowledge of the physical and spiritual realm than they actually do. It would be interesting to ask for the proof of each of these statements or at least the steps of the repeatable scientific experiment by which we all could prove them to ourselves.
The fact is, that we know the Almighty, All-Powerful, All-Loving, Creator God. He reveals Himself to us. He also reveals His nature to us. He also asks us to trust Him. He is doing a work. The fullness of that work won't be understood by us until the end of the ages of the ages.
Last updated: Sep, 2014
Toons & Vids
Flat Earth Navigation Syndrome
Logical Fallacy of Chronological Snobbery
Logical Fallacy of Retrospective Determinism
Logical Fallacy of Presentism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Appeal to Naturalism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Appeal to Materialism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Uniformitarianism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Agnosticism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Atheism
Logical Fallacy of Proof by Relativism / Escape to Relativism
Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Rationalism
"If God Exists" Fallacy
Logical Fallacy of Scientism
Finish the Job Fallacy
Concorde Fallacy / Sunk Cost Fallacy
Political Correctness Fallacy
Just World Hypothesis
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures