If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

The Magic of Evolution

When you turn on a light, do you suppose it's magic that makes the light bulb glow, or do you think there is some sort of mechanism that makes the light go on. There is a mechanism. Everything has a mechanism, and if evolution were a valid theory, then it would also have a mechanism fro adding information. (Read Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

No evidence has come forward of any new innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution ever being created by natural means. Mutations often result in changes to informaton, but information is lost or distorted, but no examples exist of genetic information being increased or created by natural means. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator. (read about the laws of information here, here, here, and here.)

Defining the word, information, is difficult. There is more work being done on this. The same goes for coded information systems. However, mutations create a kind of information in the same way that shooting a book with a gun creates information. The information in the cell must be follow very strict rules to sustain life. It must get along with all the mechanisms in the cell that are related to it, since this information is used for doing things. From this perspective, mutations make changes, but they are destructive changes. There is a lot of flimflam on Atheist websites on this subject. They are holding onto wishful thinking. Mutations are not helpful to their fanciful Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story.

The following chart makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of information that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in information. Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories. These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information. See: The 3 Rs of evolution

Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California. However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there. The evolution train's a-comin'

Evolution isn't science.

Each cell has a lot of information in the DNA. Each DNA is like a library full of documents. We don't yet know how large this library is, but we know that it's huge. All the information is there about every detail about how to reproduce. It has the exact detail about every organ. It has the detailed information about every body part. It has this information, not only for you, but for your two parents, your four grand parents, your eight great grandparents, and perhaps your 16 great great grandparents. That is a lot of information. No one knows how all these body parts work, but your DNA, in every cell in your body, knows how they work.

We know a little bit about how this information is selected to be used. We know a little bit about natural selection. Natural selection chooses from the information that is already stored in this wonderful computer, a computer that far exceeds anything that the human mind has ever tried to dream up. Natural selection could not possibly create new information. Neither could mutation, by the way.

Here is your challenge if you want to be an evolutionist. No one has ever done this, so this would be quite a feather in your hat. Explain how information could be added to this library. You may quickly realize that you won't be able to, and that you'll have to just be satisfied to create a smoke screen to keep people from seeing this obvious hole in your theory. (read about the laws of information here, here, here, and here.)

Of course, Natural Selection is real and it works to eliminate severe mutations. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator.

Much more serious is the need for coded information systems (CIS). Information doesn't sit is a vacuum. It needs mechanisms to communicate and mechanisms to carry out instructions. Without that, nothing could live. Coded information systems could not possibly develop themselves.

• https://creation.com/cis-1
• https://creation.com/cis-2
• https://creation.com/cis-3
• https://creation.com/cis-4

Someone already thought of the idea of random cosmic rays coming in and hitting this DNA computer program every once in a while. They come in there like a blind man with a gun shooting at a beautiful manuscript. Each time a bullet comes whizzing in, it knocks a letter or two into a new positions. Pow! Pow! Pow! So these random shots fix things right up, maybe not every time, but sometimes.

Do you think that might be true? If you do, you don't know much about The Second Law of Thermodynamics. If you think there may be some exceptions to The Second Law of Thermodynamics, then you are ignorant of the fact that Scientific Laws have no exceptions. That is why they are called scientific laws. If an exception is found, then they lose their status as laws.

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated (closed) systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. It actually cannot even be overcome then, since the available energy of the overall system is depleted in the process. There are no known exceptions to The Second Law of Thermodynamics.

No closed systems exist other than perhaps the Universe, that is, everything that there is taken as one whole system. Other than that, all systems are open. We know that The Second Law of Thermodynamics works because we can see it in the decay of everything around us. The Second Law of Thermodynamics works in open systems. It works on Earth. How silly and desparate it is to say that it does not.

Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

Since Evolution's stories violate The Second Law of Thermodynamics, The Law of Abiogenesis, and The Laws of Information, these stories cannot possibly be scientific or natural. They are supernatural stories. The Big Bang story is also a supernatural story. These are science fiction. They are the science of the science fiction comic books. The intent here is not to insult the followers of this belief system but to warn them that they are being fooled. The stories are not scientifically possible. From everything we can know by science, Evolution's stories are impossible. They could not have happened. Since beliefs about origins, about the validity of the Bible, and about the nature of God have such a huge effect on the decisions we make in life, this is one of the most important area of belief that anyone has.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

The cosmic ray idea is about as likely as someone shooting a gun at you and having wonderful results. Bullets don't fix things. The wishful thinking Humanistic pseudo-scientists have run all the experiments. You wouldn't believe the amount of free government money spent trying to make the Evolutionistic paradigm work at some level in some organism, money wasted by those who would impose the religious beliefs on Humanism on everyone else. Random events always lead to a net lower level of organization and information. That "random events" story doesn't cut it.

So how do you add information? How do you organize it better? Evolution has a troubling information problem.

If you're going to be an evolutionist, one of the problems that you have to face is that every bit of scientific evidence points to an almighty, all-wise God who made you and me and everything you see. In fact, it's so obvious that He says that you are without excuse.

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You see? You know because God has showed it to you and to all of us.

There is no evidence at all for things going to higher levels of information and organization. Every single test has shown that random events lead to downward changes.

Evolution isn't science.