If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

False Logic to Fool People

Rationalized speculations are made up stories. They are lies. They are not logical. They are not reasonable. Evolutionists call their own rationalized speculations reason and logic, but they are not reasonable and they are not logical. Evolutionism is based on these lies. Presumptive statements make these lies sound believable. Every source of communication is used to brainwash the public into these lies--the schools, the universities, the news media, entertainment, magazines, newspapers, and any other means that there is. Why do Evolutionistic evangelists have such tremendous zeal to convert everyone to their dogma? If Evolutionistic dogma were true, which it is not, then logic and reason have no value because logic and reason are also random. The reality is that Evolutionistic dogma is a lie and logic and reason are not random.

Logic means different things to different people. From the standpoint of an evolutionist, logic is based on the assumptions of SSWAAFT:, materialism, Naturalism, and uniformitarianism. Since these are not adequate since the 1970s when experimentation and observation had proved evolution to be an unworkable theory, an evolutionist must also include chaos theory and post-modernism in his or her bag of tricks. Post-modernism and chaos allow you to make any assertion you like. They are, in themselves, absolute license to lie. An evolutionist bases his or her logic firmly on these assumptions. These assumptions allow any tactic that is effective to win. Since so much government money is at stake, Evolutionists want to win and will play every trick to win.

This little poem illustrates how some people are really taking evolution way too seriously. It applies equally well to speculatively rationalized theologies that may have some measure of truth and also some measure of human speculative rationalism (that is, speculative presupposition) in them. As one person from a worldly liberal denomination stated: "We use the Bible plus reason." Of course, the kind of reason they use is actually rational-lie-zed fanaticizing, which is another word for making up things out of their own minds.

THE PARABLE OF THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT

It was six men of Indostan, to learning much inclined,
Who went to see the Elephant (Though all of them were blind),
That each by observation, might satisfy his mind.

The First approached the Elephant, and, happening to fall,
Against his broad and sturdy side, at once began to bawl:
"God bless me, but the Elephant is very like a wall!"

The Second feeling of the tusk, cried: "Ho! what have we here,
So very round and smooth and sharp? To me 'tis mighty clear,
This wonder of an Elephant is very like a spear!"

The Third approached the animal, and, happening to take,
The squirming trunk within his hands, thus boldly up he spake:
"I see," quoth he, "the Elephant is very like a snake!"

The Fourth reached out an eager hand, and felt about the knee:
"What most this wondrous beast is like is mighty plain," quoth he,
"Tis clear enough the Elephant is very like a tree!"

The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear, said: "Even the blindest man
Can tell what this resembles most; Deny the fact who can,
This marvel of an Elephant, is very like a fan!"

The Sixth no sooner had begun, about the beast to grope,
Than, seizing on the swinging tail, that fell within his scope,
"I see," quothe he, "the Elephant is very like a rope!"

And so these men of Indostan, disputed loud and long,
Each in his own opinion, exceeding stiff and strong,
Though each was partly in the right, and all were in the wrong!

Moral:

So oft in theologic wars, the disputants, I ween,
Rail on in utter ignorance, of what each other mean,
And prate about the Elephant, not one of them has seen!

- John Godfrey Saxe (1816-1887)