Post-Modern Religion |
You are here:
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Faulty Conclusions
>
Post Modernism
>
Post-Modern Religion
|
Post-Modernism is an Anti-Christ ReligionPost Modernism is a dangerous anti-Christ religion. Post Modernism is a final desperate attempt to imagine or suppose a world without God. Post Modernism presupposes rationalism and the assumptions of modernism. It adds the presupposition that there is no truth, no lie, no absolutes. There are only winners and losers under post modernism. Post Modernism had its beginnings in the 1970s when Modernism failed. Post Modernism is a fall back position of desperation for those who don't want a relationship with God. Both Modernism and Post Modernism leave either humanity or nature... or both as god and ruler of the universe. In the 1800s, under the original rules that the Modernists set up, the Modernists started with the assumption of Rationalism. Rationalism is the assumption that assumptions are valid thoughts. In fact, under Rationalism, assumptions are more valid than observation. Given the assumption of Rationalism, the modernists made three more assumptions: Materialism, Naturalism, and Uniformitarianism. Materialism assumes that there was no God. Naturalism assumes that God does nothing. Uniformitarianism assumes no Creation or Flood. Modernism, given these three assumptions, set out to prove that there was no God, God did nothing, and no Creation or Flood. That seems like cheating, and it is insanity, but otherwise intelligent people went along with this. By the 1970s, they had done enough experimentation to show that these rules, which they had termed "The Axioms of Science," were absolutely false. Even stacking the deck in the way they had, the obvious Creator was impossible to deny. That's why they needed Post-Modernism and Chaos Theory so they could live in a make-believe world where there would be no absolutes, at least in their reprobate minds. Under Post-Modernism and Chaos Theory, there is no need for internal consistency. Parts of understanding can be compartmentalized, using differing assumptions that are needed to prove each compartmentalized part. You see, there is no right or wrong under Post Modernism, but all things are relative. There are only winners and losers. Since there is no truth or right or wrong in Post Modernism, the emphasis is on winning. The way you win is to control all media. The way you win is to present effectively. A skilled liar is greatly to be respected in Post Modernism. Every effort is made to make it impossible to know who is lying and who is telling the truth. Light is put for darkness and darkness is put for light. Evil is called, good. Good is called evil. "Something similar to Pilate’s truth-ignoring dismissiveness has mushroomed among postmodern thinkers. They deny confidence in absolute truth because their mindset at its core is humanistic, asserting that all truth originates from human experience. Postmoderns argue that human finiteness and fallibility prevent us from knowing anything with certainty. This is just another way of denying that God is powerful and intelligent enough to effectively communicate His truths to fallen humans. Like the Sadducees whom Christ rebuked, postmodern thinkers and teachers are blamably ignorant of both the Scriptures and the power of God." ~ https://www.icr.org/article/7310/ It's interesting to note that ungodly people are often dogmatic about some basic presuppositions. These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions. They are filters and a way to censor out any information that reminds them of the existence of God. They set up complex rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
![]()
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionRecently Viewed |