| Breeding Experiments |
|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Breeding Experiments Debunk EvolutionThe Many breeding experiments (at huge cost to taxpayers) were conducted to unsuccessfully attempt to prove that micro evolution (a deceptive word that actually means mutations or adaptations and has nothing to do with the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication) will lead to macro evolution (that is, molecules to man--the General Theory of Evolution) over time. They have confirmed just the opposite of what they were trying to prove. No matter how they try, they find that no information is added to genetic material (which is the real claim of evolutionism) by random events. Information comes from intelligence--in the case of the creation, unimaginable intelligence. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit. Chance mutations move organizms toward less information in the genome if anything. Random events can't add organization and information to that which is stored in the DNA molecule.They do not increase the information or create inprovements that would develop into a more complex creature, yet Evolutionists claim that chance mutations are the mechanism for adding information to the genome. Random events of any kind don't add to information in the gene pool either. Random events always remove information. Genetic information that is already in the cell will produce what has been termed micro evolution, but never a new kind of living thing. There are very clear limits to the changes produced by the genetic variability that is built into the cells, and it should be clear that the ability to vary and adapt was put into the cell by the Creator. Survival of the fittest will only filter out mutations. It will not add information. Survival of the fittest will only select from the information already in the gene pool. It has no power to add information to the gene pool. This is one example of the enormity of the improbable, unworkable hypothesis. Evolution is a prime example of a politically correct hypothesis, which must be defended even though it is preposterous"Read John Sanford's book Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome and wonder how intelligent people could ever bring themselves to believe that mutations would create progress in fitness, and continue to believe natural selection built all the wonders of life, decades after it was demonstrated by evolution-believing secular population geneticists to be unworkable."(Source: CREV - read more) Depending on which definition you use, Natural Selection can be real. It works to eliminate severe mutations. Natural Selection can mean different things depending on the context in which it is used, though. Some of those contexts actually try to transform Natural Selection into molecules-to-man Evolution. They also try to confuse people into believing that small adaptations (calling this micro-evolution, which is a deceiving term.) add up to molecules-to-man Evolution. At other times, Natural Selection is written about as if it were an intelligent all-powerful god that thinks things through and does them. But Natural Selection as a description of the way that severe mutations result in the death of the mutated life form is real. It can't add information and it appears that mutation never adds any information either. At least, no one has ever been able to observe information being added despite many tax dollars trying to do so. Most mutations aren't detrimental enough, however, for Natural Selection to operate. Small mutations can build up in a population over time and cause extinction. It is illegitimate to use Natural Selection to support Evolution. Natural Selection supports a young Earth and a Creator. Information can be added to the DNA through natural processes. (see video above) Astronomy
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
History
Paleontology
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionClear Problems With Evolution Evolution Was Never Observed Broken Arguments Missing Links No Mechanism For Evolutionism Complexity Nothing Creates Itself Life Is Not Self-Creating No Evidence Evolution Is Unbelievable Intelligence Scientific Method Q&A No New Information? Q&A Kangaroos In Australia Recently Viewed |
