| Broken Arguments |
|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Evolution is a series of broken arguments; it consists of one broken argument after another. As a result, many evolutionists are turning to forms of occultism. They are turning to New Age. They are turning to chaos theory and post modernism. They are turning to things like Mother Nature and magical punctuated equilibrium. Why do Evolutionists still use Darwin's so-called "Tree of Life" as proof of Evolution when Darwin's "Tree of Life" has been debunked? Darwin's Tree of Life has Fallen Why do Evolutionists look at the facts and then come to conclusions that are in conflict with the facts? For instance: "Many texts are very open about the implications of Darwinism for theism. One teaches that Darwin's immeasurably important contribution to science was to show that, despite life's apparent evidence of design and purpose, mechanistic causes explain all biological phenomena." from Darwinism: Survival without Purpose by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. Why do Evolutionists tell inverted fantasies? "They are the grass-ate-the-cow kind of tall tales, the inverted, upside-down kind of fantasy... All Chihuahuas are different but not one will ever evolve to a cat or a raccoon or anything else. So too "macroevolution" as an extension of microevolution is afraudulent misrepresentation that has never been seen because it is an inverted fantasy like grass eating a cow. " from Biology Confronts Evolution by Joseph Mastropaolo, Ph.D. Why do Evolutionists ignore the most obvious laws of science? "The Primordial Law of the Universe is natura semper scalas descendet, nature always descends, that is, devolves. Therefore, devolution, never evolution, is the relentless, inescapable law of the universe. The true nature of the universe, and therefore biology, is devolution, the exact opposite of masquerading evolution interloping in public school and university biology textbooks as science" from Biology Confronts Evolution by Joseph Mastropaolo, Ph.D. Why do scientific journals allow, for Evolution, what would never be allowed in checkable science? "Creationists invariably highlight numerous flaws in evolutionary literature pertaining to methodology, unsubstantiated statements, logical fallacies, and an endless stream of "just-so" story telling. These types of things would never be tolerated in the scientific journals related to my fields of engineering and medicine. But in the unverifiable world of evolutionary literature, peer reviewers regularly let all of these scientific blunders straight through to publication. The published creationist's criticisms are almost always proved correct when the high profile evolutionary claims are later quietly withdrawn (Ida is a recent example)." from Raising the Banner for Creation Truth by John D. Morris, President Why do Evolutionists just find new ways for evolution to work magic whenever the sceintific observations and data conflict with what the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication predicts? https://creationsafaris.com/crev201102.htm#20110131a Why do the ungodly people hold so tightly to their presuppositions? Presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions. But the person who made the assumption forgot that it was an assumption and added the assumption to their paradigm, their internal idea about reality. The trouble with paradigms is that they are fake realities. Everyone has a paradigm/fake reality. These paradigms are powerful, since they seem to be more real than reality itself. They are limitations that filter out any evidence that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Astronomy
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
History
Paleontology
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionClear Problems With Evolution Evolution Was Never Observed Missing Links No Mechanism For Evolutionism Breeding Experiments Complexity Nothing Creates Itself Life Is Not Self-Creating No Evidence Evolution Is Unbelievable Intelligence Scientific Method Q&A No New Information? Q&A Kangaroos In Australia Recently Viewed |
