|Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Evolution is a series of broken arguments; it consists of one broken argument after another. As a result, many evolutionists are turning to forms of occultism. They are turning to New Age. They are turning to chaos theory and post modernism. They are turning to things like Mother Nature and magical punctuated equilibrium.
Why do Evolutionists still use Darwin's so-called "Tree of Life" as proof of Evolution when Darwin's "Tree of Life" has been debunked? Darwin's Tree of Life has Fallen
Why do Evolutionists look at the facts and then come to conclusions that are in conflict with the facts? For instance: "Many texts are very open about the implications of Darwinism for theism. One teaches that Darwin's immeasurably important contribution to science was to show that, despite life's apparent evidence of design and purpose, mechanistic causes explain all biological phenomena." from Darwinism: Survival without Purpose by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.
Why do Evolutionists tell inverted fantasies? "They are the grass-ate-the-cow kind of tall tales, the inverted, upside-down kind of fantasy... All Chihuahuas are different but not one will ever evolve to a cat or a raccoon or anything else. So too "macroevolution" as an extension of microevolution is afraudulent misrepresentation that has never been seen because it is an inverted fantasy like grass eating a cow. " from Biology Confronts Evolution by Joseph Mastropaolo, Ph.D.
Why do Evolutionists ignore the most obvious laws of science? "The Primordial Law of the Universe is natura semper scalas descendet, nature always descends, that is, devolves. Therefore, devolution, never evolution, is the relentless, inescapable law of the universe. The true nature of the universe, and therefore biology, is devolution, the exact opposite of masquerading evolution interloping in public school and university biology textbooks as science" from Biology Confronts Evolution by Joseph Mastropaolo, Ph.D.
Why do scientific journals allow, for Evolution, what would never be allowed in checkable science? "Creationists invariably highlight numerous flaws in evolutionary literature pertaining to methodology, unsubstantiated statements, logical fallacies, and an endless stream of "just-so" story telling. These types of things would never be tolerated in the scientific journals related to my fields of engineering and medicine. But in the unverifiable world of evolutionary literature, peer reviewers regularly let all of these scientific blunders straight through to publication. The published creationist's criticisms are almost always proved correct when the high profile evolutionary claims are later quietly withdrawn (Ida is a recent example)." from Raising the Banner for Creation Truth by John D. Morris, President
Why do Evolutionists just find new ways for evolution to work magic whenever the sceintific observations and data conflict with what the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication predicts? http://creationsafaris.com/crev201102.htm#20110131a
Why do the ungodly people hold so tightly to their presuppositions? Presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions. But the person who made the assumption forgot that it was an assumption and added the assumption to their paradigm, their internal idea about reality. The trouble with paradigms is that they are fake realities. Everyone has a paradigm/fake reality. These paradigms are powerful, since they seem to be more real than reality itself. They are limitations that filter out any evidence that supports the existence of God. They set up a web of rules to filter out God. They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism. Naturalism claims that God does nothing. Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm. Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record. Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored. The way that it is censored can take several forms. The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean. A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly. If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth. The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people. When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it." They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge. The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator. They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.
Bible, God, theology
Biology (creation vs evolution)
Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science
Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth
Last updated: Jun, 2013
Toons & Vids
There Are Several Very Clear Reasons that Evolution Presents False Dogma and These Reasons Cannot Be Refuted.
How Do We Know That Evolutionary Progress Has Never Been Observed?
Evolution Is A Series Of Broken Arguments
There Is No Evidence Of So-Called Evolutionary Links Between Kinds Of Living Things
What Is The Basis Or Mechanism That Would Allow Evolutionism's Claims To Work?
Breeding experiments have done much to debunk the evolutionary dogma.
Complexity, Information, And The 2nd Law Of Thermodynamics Show Evolution To Be Impossible
Nothing Creates Itself -- Ever!
Evolutionists Make The Sanity-defying Claim That The First Strand Of DNA Arose By Natural Selection.
Has anyone ever seen proof of evolution?
Who Could Even Believe Such a Thing?! No One, Really. Some People Brainwash Themselves.
There Are No Examples Of Continued Overall Increases In Complexity And Information Without Intelligence.
What is the new type of scientific method that has been developed especially for evolution?
Questions and Answers: What is the basis for your statement that no new genetic information is produced or created?
Questions and Answers: What About the Kangaroo in Australia Only? Does That Prove Evolution?
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures