| Exception That Proves the Rule Fallacy |
Exception That Proves the Rule Fallacy / Exception That Tests the Rule Fallacy / Exceptio Probat Regulam FallacyThe exception that proves the rule fallacy is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The Exception That Proves the Rule Fallacy / Exception That Tests the Rule Fallacy / Exceptio Probat Regulam Fallacy occurs when an exception to a conclusion (rule) is seen as evidence for the rule. This is a cliché that is used to defend a position that has flaws. The correct response would be to investigate the matter more carefully, find out why there are exceptions and if there really is a rule at all. Examples of the Exception That Proves the Rule Fallacy / Exception That Tests the Rule Fallacy / Exceptio Probat Regulam Fallacy
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionNon Sequitur Sherlock Holmes Fallacy Availability Heuristic Blind Men and an Elephant Counter-Induction Idola Fori Idola Theatri Idola Specus Idola Tribus Loki\'s Wager Proving Too Much Greek Math It Could Be Worse It Could Be Better Retrogressive Causation Alternative Syllogism Golden Hammer Selling the Defect Ignorance of Refutation Proving a Premise from a Conclusion Recently Viewed |
