Inevitability |
You are here:
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Fallacies of Cause
>
Inevitability
|
The Logical Fallacy of Inevitability / Retrospective Determinism / Path DependencyInevitability is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The Logical Fallacy of Inevitability / Retrospective Determinism / Path Dependency occurs when an excuse is made for behavior that there was no choice in the matter, since what happened had to happen. Some may argue that God reveals predestination through Scripture. Take the verses that are thought to say this. Do those passages read exactly that way, or are some assumptions needed. If this is an interpretation of Scripture, can you be certain that you have not used assumptions to add to Scripture or to eliminate Scripture to come up with this conclusion, or is it merely human reasoning added to Scripture? Keep in mind that the word that is translated as “predestination” is actually “set ahead of time” in the same way that God would set an elder. Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Inevitability / Retrospective Determinism / Path Dependency
![]()
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionCausal Fallacy Limited Depth Causal Reductionism Determinism Furtive Fallacy Fallacy of Multiplication Conspiracy Theory Unnatural Fallacy Scapegoating Appeal to Coincidence Subverted Support Lurking Variable Taking Undeserved Credit Correlation Proves Causation Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Wrong Direction Ion Common Cause Insignificant Cause Elephant Repellent Recently Viewed |