If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Proof That Is Not There  

Last night, I saw, I do declare,  
Some proof of evolutionism that wasn't there.  
It wasn't there again today,  
Which proves evolutionism, wouldn't you say?

Copyright: Bob Stenson

This is the manner of evolutionistic "science."  This "science" consists of

• presumptive statements that are not demonstrated by what is observed
• declaring that the observations point to evolution when they do not
• explanations of why the evidence does not support evolutionism

Once you get past these, you will get the explanation that the evidence for Evolution is in the unknown.  Evolutionists are convinced that someday evidence will appear.  Such a claim is supernatural prophecy to be sure, but that god from whom this prophecy comes is the god of the human mind.  This is the religion of Humanism with major doctrines of rationalism (the idea that the human mind can create knowledge without observation or God's revelation), evolution, old-earthism, Naturalism, materialism, uniformitarianism, liberalism, and post-modernism.

Evolution has a troubling information problem. There is no compelling evidence that molecules-to-man evolution happened or that it could possibly happen. (Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.

Evolution is merely a series of scientifically impossible stories based on arbitrary assumptions and rationalizations that are told to explain the creation without the Creator God. They are religious lies of Atheists. The stories of evolution violate many of the basic laws of science such as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. We observe adaptations and mutations, but we also observe the limits of adaptation and the fact that no new information is ever added by adaptation and mutation.  We observe that great volumes of information would have to be added in order for molecules to man evolution to take place and we see that this would be impossible.

Note that there is no evidence at all that evolution actually happened.  There is much evidence that it could not have happened.  However, lies are easy to tell.  When only one side of the story is told as it is in almost all the schools, then it makes lies extremely easy to tell.  If you get the kids involved in sin, then they want to believe any story that takes away God's authority.

A typical response to this is for an evolutionist to point out some instance where forensic evidence can be used to show a logical conclusion based on evidence that an event took place even though the event itself cannot be repeated.  Examples include a theft or a dog doing damage while you were away.  These are straw man arguments in that they misrepresent what was just said in the previous paragraph.  We have observed that people can steal and we have seen dogs do damage.  We know that these things are possible and we can actually do experiments to repeat the processes and show that the evidence that was left behind is consistent with the evidence left behind by our experiments in theft or dog damage.  No one, on the other hand, has ever observed or done an experiment in which DNA was created from chemicals or DNA assembled itself into a living cell or a fish turned into a lizard or a lizard turned into a human being.  They have tried and they have lied about the results of trying, but no one has ever observed these impossible claims.  Evolution is simply a story that requires that scientists must ignore all the evidence that would refute the evolutionary story and they must interpret the results of their science through the distorted lens of evolution.

Ungodly people are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, materialism, and uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  The ungodly may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support God's version and refute the version of the ungodly, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that ungodly people use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The data clearly demolishes the story of the ungodly and clearly supports the reality of the Creator God, His Bible, and His abiding Presence in His people.  When confronted with the obvious, a closed-minded ungodly person says, "I can't understand it."  They are willingly ignorant because they refuse to hold God in their knowledge.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.