US Geological Society Misleads Students and Teachers |
You are here:
US Geological Society Misleads Students and Teachers
|
If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
U. S. Geological Society Misleads Students & Teachers
The following is a quote from biblicalgeology.net:
It all sounds very precise and technical but they leave out a key fact. It is impossible to calculate the age of a rock from such information because we need to know the radioactive content of the rock when it formed as well as the entire history of the rock until the sample was collected. In order to calculate a date the geologist first has to assume the geological history of the rock. In other words, all radioactive ages quoted are "guesses", in that they are based on assumptions about the past.
This is yet another example of the typical circular logic: We know how old the fossils are because we know how old we want them to be to satisfy the demands of the story of Evolutions and we know how old the rocks are because of the fossils that are in them and we know how old the fossils are because of the rocks they are in. Once they have established the age of the rocks using the story of evolution and the fossils, they then hide that level of analysis and go to simple circular reasoning. Since people like biblicalgeology.net point out the circular reasoning, the U. S. Geological Society takes it one step further and lies about how they have developed the "age of the rocks." This is known as a bold-faced lie.
Many Christians have lost their faith because of speculations regarding the age of the earth. These speculations usually put death before sin, eliminate the world-wide flood and replace it with millions of years, and eliminate the creation and replace it with billions of years. If death is before sin, then sin does not cause death. If sin does not cause death, that destroys the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We are not dogmatically claiming to know that the Earth is 6,000 years old. We know that God created the Heavens and the Earth in six days and we know the number of generations between Adam and Christ. That's about it. Even though a plain reading of Scripture seems to indicate a young Earth; even though there is zero observed evidence and only circular reasoning and speculations that support old Earth stories, we can't even deny the possibility that God could have done something that Scripture doesn't hint at and that has left no scientific evidence. It is possible. It just is not worth the time to think about it. There is plenty of evidence for a young Earth and a recent creation:
![]()
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question Topic: Age of the UniverseAccording to old-earth theology, the abundant polonium radiohalos found in granite rocks worldwide cannot be exist. In other words, once again, reality conflicts with evolutionism. Polonium has a very short half life, which means that the \"millions-of-years\" assumptions of the old-earth theology could not exist. If the \"millions-of-years\" were actually true, there would be no naturally occurring polonium. This one fact proves the old-earth to be a fairy tale for... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Also, be sure to study this Indepth Study of Distant Starlight. The deception that says, \"DISTANT STAR LIGHT WOULD TAKE BILLIONS OF YEARS TO REACH EARTH AND THIS IS A PROBLEM FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE THAT THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD WITHOUT ERROR!\" is that last standing lie of those who... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Indian Amber Looks Young, So It Must Be Old? The following is an excerpt from an article that appeared on creationrevolution.com. The study\'s lead author, Jes Rust from the University of Bonn, stated in a university press release that amber-encased fossils usually decay with time. He said that these insects seemed to have been preserved by... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. In studies, radioactive dating methods have proven to only be effective if you don\'t really know the age of an object. If you know the age of an object, then radioactive doesn\'t work. If you have no idea how old something is, then radioactive dating does work. At least that\'s what the evolutionists tell... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Coal Indicates a Young Earth and Global Flood, NOT an Old Earth It should be noted that science does not, by itself, have the capacity to prove either a young or an old Earth. Both positions, the old-Earth position and the young-Earth position, use the same scientific facts to come to very different conclusions... This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Big Bang is Baloney The... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Evolutionism: A Religion that Requires an Old Earth Many Christians have walked away from faith because of speculations regarding the age of the earth. These speculations usually put death before sin, eliminate the world-wide flood and replace it with millions of years, and eliminate the creation and replace it with billions of years. If death... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. The American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) You wonder where the Atheists get all this money to start all these organizations they control. The answer is that they get your money, your tax dollars. The American Scientific Affiliation (ASA), a group controlled by Evolutionists, refuses to publish the facts concerning the RATE project and is instead publishing... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Problem for Atheistic Astronomers Atheistic Astronomers are depressed that the scientific facts do not support the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication. Why would astronomer, Thomas Clarke, feel that \'It\'s a bit depressing to think that Earth-like planets are too special?\' What is depressing Mr. Clarke? It is the fact that evolutionary astronomers have excluded a Creator... This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Ungodly people believe fabricated... |
Recently Viewed |