| Big Bang Baloney |
|
Subpages:
Depressed Astronomers
|
|
You are here:
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Answers for Witness
>
Stories Versus Revelation
>
Creation, Flood, Etc.
>
Big Bang Baloney
|
|
This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don't get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Big Bang is BaloneyThe Big Bang is speculative. God forbids speculation. Speculation quickly solidifies in the mind and becomes a stronghold, a lie that is difficult to overcome. Lies are stumbling blocks. Lies bind us spiritually. It is the Truth, Jesus Christ, Who sets us free. Many Christians have lost their faith because of speculations regarding the age of the Earth. These speculations usually put death before sin, eliminate the world-wide flood and replace it with millions of years, and eliminate the creation and replace it with billions of years. If death is before sin, then sin does not cause death. If sin does not cause death, that destroys the Gospel of Jesus Christ. They don't realize that the Big Bang Theory is not a theory in the scientific sense. It is merely a hypothesis that has long been debunked. It violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and Boyles Law. In survives on ad hoc hypotheses to rescue it from the junk heap. On the other hand, we know that, because of relativity (Einstein's Theory) the age of the Universe and the age of the Earth may vary depending where you put the clock. Time does not pass at the same rate throughout the Universe. Billions of years could have passed for those distant stars while only part of a day was passing in our own solar system. (Read more here). Even thought everything that God reveals through Scripture points to a young Earth and all of the scientific observations that have been made can be used to support a young Earth more easily than they can be used to support an old Earth, yet we can't deny the possibility that God could have done something that Scripture doesn't hint at and that has left no scientific evidence. It is possible. It just is not worth the time to think about it. More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here The big bang theory is not even a theory. It is a really silly story based on human creativity. A closed system can only go down to finally be equally dispersed heat. If the universe is a closed system, then, the universe could not have created itself. The universe is, in fact, an open system, and God created it. No other explanation works. Did the "God Particle" Create Matter? In an article titled "Millions of Dollars to Recreate a Myth," R. L. David Jolly writes the following" "... by smashing the lead ions together that they will produce the same condition that existed just fractions of a second after a dense tiny ball of energy exploded some 13.7 billion years ago. They believe that at that fraction of a second after the Big Bang that there was a special state of matter dubbed the quark-gluon plasma, giving them clues to how it evolved into the state of matter that exists today. (Personally, I've always wondered where the dense tiny ball of energy came from to start with? If this ball of energy created the Big Bang, what created the first ball of energy?)" In this same article, Mr. Jolly mentions that inflation (nothing to do with our economy), dark matter, and dark energy have never been observed by scientists or anyone else. And he quotes a letter from a group of scientists to the promoters of the Big Bang fairy tale: "In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory. But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors." This is all very obvious to anyone who does any investigation of the matter and has an open mind. In fact, there are many non-sciences that are trying to ride the coat tails of real science by calling themselves science. One of these non-sciences is evolution. Evolution also has never been observed. The fossil record shows it to be false. Increasingly, evolutionary articles try to explain away the facts so that they can still proclaim evolution. Related Links:
There is plenty of evidence for a young Earth and a recent creation:
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question Topic: Age of the UniverseAccording to old-earth theology, the abundant polonium radiohalos found in granite rocks worldwide cannot be exist. In other words, once again, reality conflicts with evolutionism. Polonium has a very short half life, which means that the \"millions-of-years\" assumptions of the old-earth theology could not exist. If the \"millions-of-years\" were actually true, there would be no naturally occurring polonium. This one fact proves the old-earth to be a fairy tale for... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Also, be sure to study this Indepth Study of Distant Starlight. The deception that says, \"DISTANT STAR LIGHT WOULD TAKE BILLIONS OF YEARS TO REACH EARTH AND THIS IS A PROBLEM FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE THAT THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD WITHOUT ERROR!\" is that last standing lie of those who... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Indian Amber Looks Young, So It Must Be Old? The following is an excerpt from an article that appeared on creationrevolution.com. The study\'s lead author, Jes Rust from the University of Bonn, stated in a university press release that amber-encased fossils usually decay with time. He said that these insects seemed to have been preserved by... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. In studies, radioactive dating methods have proven to only be effective if you don\'t really know the age of an object. If you know the age of an object, then radioactive doesn\'t work. If you have no idea how old something is, then radioactive dating does work. At least that\'s what the evolutionists tell... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. U. S. Geological Society Misleads Students & Teachers The following is a quote from biblicalgeology.net: It all sounds very precise and technical but they leave out a key fact. It is impossible to calculate the age of a rock from such information because we need to know the radioactive content of the rock when it... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Coal Indicates a Young Earth and Global Flood, NOT an Old Earth It should be noted that science does not, by itself, have the capacity to prove either a young or an old Earth. Both positions, the old-Earth position and the young-Earth position, use the same scientific facts to come to very different conclusions... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Evolutionism: A Religion that Requires an Old Earth Many Christians have walked away from faith because of speculations regarding the age of the earth. These speculations usually put death before sin, eliminate the world-wide flood and replace it with millions of years, and eliminate the creation and replace it with billions of years. If death... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. The American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) You wonder where the Atheists get all this money to start all these organizations they control. The answer is that they get your money, your tax dollars. The American Scientific Affiliation (ASA), a group controlled by Evolutionists, refuses to publish the facts concerning the RATE project and is instead publishing... If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Problem for Atheistic Astronomers Atheistic Astronomers are depressed that the scientific facts do not support the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication. Why would astronomer, Thomas Clarke, feel that \'It\'s a bit depressing to think that Earth-like planets are too special?\' What is depressing Mr. Clarke? It is the fact that evolutionary astronomers have excluded a Creator... This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Ungodly people believe fabricated... |
Other Pages in this sectionHow To Respond Where Does the Evidence Point? The Age of the Earth Flood Evidence Creation v. Evolution Lyell, Darwin + Gullible Christians & Students Paluxy fossil human footprints The Real Question Cain\'s Wife? The Land of Nod So Many Races? Naturalistic Explanation Morality Before Religion? Dino Eggs The Simple Cell? Dinosaurs in the Bible Distant Starlight The Human Genome and DNA Dino Tracks Cause & Effect The Bias of Scientists The Ear The Theory of Everything Is Creation a Viable Model of Origins? Recently Viewed |
