| Avoiding Specific Numbers |
|
You are here:
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Statistical Fallacies
>
Avoiding Specific Numbers
|
Logical Fallacy of Avoiding Specific NumbersAvoiding specific numbers is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The Logical Fallacy of Avoiding Specific Numbers occurs when statistics are given with either hedging words surrounding them or using general terms. This is generally a hedging tactic when claims are supported by questionable evidence. Examples of Logical Fallacy of Avoiding Specific NumbersNewspaper Comment: "[a candidate for office] is stressing job growth, but religiously avoiding specific numbers. Evidently, if she wins, she will take a look-back approach in four years, declaring her jobs policy a success, whether 5,000 or 500,000 jobs are created." This is the use of the logical fallacy of avoiding specific numbers for the purpose of making it possible to later declare victory regardless of the outcome. Team Member: "I have a lot of the work done." Project Manager: "Specifically, what percentage of the work to you have completed?" Team Member: "It's really getting close." Project Manager: "I need to know when it will be finished so I can plan the next step. Can you give me a number?" Often, specific numbers seem to be scary. Estimating time on tasks can be tricky, and, in some environments, missing the target date is dangerous to one's career. In these cases where management by fear reigns, the best course may be to never give a firm estimate. You can't miss a vague estimate. 
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionMisused Statistics Innumeracy Clustering Illusion Bad Statistical Data Biased Statistical Method Biased Calculation Biased Conclusion from Statistics Biased Reporting of Statistics Loaded Statistics Generalizing from a Hypostatization Error in Sampling False Precision Self-Selected Biased Sample Statistical Apples and Oranges Ludic Fallacy Fishing for Data Base Rate Neglect Isolated Examples Hasty Generalization Small Sample Size Bias General Rule Fallacy Specificity Overwhelming Exception Stereotyping Sweeping Generalization Gambler\'s Fallacy Appeal to Possibility Appeal to Infinite Possibilities Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy Misuse of Averages Recently Viewed |
