| Stacking the Deck |
|
You are here:
Meaning
>
Christian Witness
>
Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies
>
Fallacies of Omission
>
Stacking the Deck
|
Logical Fallacy of Stacking the Deck / Cherry Picking / Suppressed Evidence / Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence / Selective Observation / Fallacy of Exclusion / Ignoring the Counter Evidence / One-SidednessThe logical fallacy of stacking the deck / cherry picking / cherry picking data / suppressed evidence / fallacy of incomplete evidence / argument from selective observation / argument by half-truth / card staking / fallacy of exclusion / ignoring the counter evidence / one-sided assessment / slanting / one-sidedness occurs when someone consciously or unconsciously eliminates or is unaware of information that is relevant to the conclusion. Examples of the Logical Fallacy of Stacking the Deck / Cherry Picking / Cherry Picking Data / Suppressed Evidence / Fallacy of Incomplete Evidence / Argument from Selective Observation / Argument by Half-Truth / Card Staking / Fallacy of Exclusion / Ignoring the Counter Evidence / One-Sided Assessment / Slanting / One-Sidedness
The dates that are determined by radiometric dating are routinely discarded if they are not what was expected. This is a huge problem, but students aren't informed of these problems until they are so thoroughly brainwashed that they are willing to accept just about anything as evidence for evolution. https://creation.com/flaws-in-dating-the-earth-as-ancient - https://creation.com/radioactive-dating-anomalies
Rationalizing away the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, the Law of Abiogenesis, The Law of Cause and Effect, and the Law of Universal Information is common when evaluating the inductive reasoning that supports the stories of molecules-to-man evolution. 
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionAmbiguity Effect McNamara Fallacy Head in the Sand Suppression of the Agent Fading Affect Bias Unteachable Selective Refutation A-Priorism Audiatur Et Altera Pars Ignoring Historical Example Overlooking Secondary Consequences Uncontrolled Factors Missing Link Moving the Goal Posts Gravity Game Demanding Impossible Evidence Unfalsifiability / Untestibility Invincible Ignorance Argument from Ignorance Ad Ignorantiam Question God of the Gaps Argument from Silence No True Scotsman No True Scientist Fallacy of Opposition Frozen Abstraction Falsified Inductive Generalization Argument from the Negative Accident Fallacy Reverse Accident Best-in-Field Abductive Fallacy Denialism Logical Fallacy of Reductionism / Oversimplification Very Simple Answer Reductionism Taboo Fallacy Recently Viewed |
