This battle is not about someone else's ideas versus our ideas. We need to decide what is a valid thought. This is really the basis of the difference between the two arguments. What authority will govern how we interpret facts. Evolutionists try to say that they are neutral, but they obviously are not. All science and knowledge operates in terms of the world-views and paradigms of the scientists. In other words, there is a religion behind all science, whether that religion is serves the true God, humanity as gods, or some other god. Most evolutionists are working from a basis of a religion such as Secular Humanism or Agnosticism or Atheism or some kind of make-believe Christianity (which is simply a cloak to hide ungodliness).

Those scientists who are convinced that the evidence points to Creation by Almighty God on the one side and evolutionists on the other side are looking at the same observations, the same scientific facts. But they are coming up with different conclusions. And the evolutionists can't even answer the "15 Questions for Evolutionists". Evolutionists assume no God, no flood, no miracles, no spirits, no creation, rejecting all observation that conflicts with these assumptions. Creationists presuppose God, the worldwide flood, miracles, spirits, and creation. Regardless of the presuppositions, the evidence points to the God of the Bible. Those who ignore the overwhelming evidence are without excuse.

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You see? You know because God has showed it to you and to all of us.

�

In coming to conclusions from the data, something must be added to the data. The thing that is added to the data is either divine revelation or else it is human rationalization. Evolutionists tend to believe in human revelatory powers--rationalization--while creationists tend to believe that God has the ability to reveal, especially through the Bible. Both these tendencies to believe in miraculous revelation have been tested and it can readily be seen that the creationists are correct and the evolutionists are wrong.

The human mind does not have any ability to reveal. And the Bible continues to stand against all attacks. In addition, what can be observed confirms that the Bible is right. The assumptions of Humanism, Atheism, Agnoticism, and imitation Christianity do not line up with what can be observed.

Topic: Evolutionism

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   What Must One Do To Be An Evolutionist? Short Answer Those who decide to follow a career in Evolutionism, which isn\'t science, must subscribe to a different form of reasoning that allows them to filter out facts they don\'t like and make up \"facts\" that they need. They need to take New Age religion\'s attitude that...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Science has merit. Scientists...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. They lie about Natural Selection, claiming that Natural Selection is Evolution.  Natural Selection...

Evolution is not even a theory as the word, theory, is defined by evolutionists. A theory, to an evolutionist, is defined as something that has been proved. There is not a shred of proof for the fairy tale we call \"evolution.\" In fact, evolutionists can\'t even answer the \"15 Questions for Evolutionists\". Although evolutionists claim to have evidence for evolution, this claim always falls apart under scrutiny. Evolutionism is increasingly becoming a...

Evolutionism stays politically alive by using false claims, claims that are later proven false.By the time one false evolutionistic claim is proven to be false, the evolutionists have developed a new false claim to take its place. Looking back in the history of evolution, you can observe a history of one false claim after another. One of the newest false claims of evolutionism is the concept of junk DNA. If...

Evolutionists will often use the word, \"micro-evolution,\" which is an interesting form of equivocation. This equivocation, using the word, \"micro-evolution,\" is a deliberate attempt to deceive. The deceiving term, micro-evolution is used to try to make the student think that two unrelated processes are related. The way this is done is to use the word deceitfully in a way that encompasses both of the unrelated processes. What they are deceitfully...

There is no Compelling Evidence for Evolution   While it would be faulty logic to try to prove that Evolution never happened just because of the amazing lack of evidence for such Evolution, it would also be a lie to claim that there is compelling evidence to believe in Evolution. In fact, there is real compelling scientific evidence against it, and the fact that evolutionists cannot answer the \"15 Questions for Evolutionists.\" There...

Evolution Violates What Can Easily Be Observed   Evolutionism violates many easily observed scientifically proven principles. Evolution isn\'t science. Two of the most obvious of these scientific laws that evolutionism violates are the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. There are countless additional examples. Ungodly people use simple-minded assumptions as filters to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God. ...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Mutation Questions & Answers What is the relationship of extinction to natural selection? Natural Selection Is Not \'Nature\'s Intelligence In a world where science has degenerated into shouting slogans, we hear all types of claims, many of them false.  Natural Selection claims to include the capability for creatures to generate various traits that improve their ability...

According to old-earth theology, the abundant polonium radiohalos found in granite rocks worldwide cannot be exist.  In other words, once again, reality conflicts with evolutionism.   Polonium has a very short half life, which means that the \"millions-of-years\" assumptions of the old-earth theology could not exist.  If the \"millions-of-years\" were actually true, there would be no naturally occurring polonium.  This one fact proves the old-earth to be a fairy tale for...

Evolution and Confusing Words Have you noticed how many important words have at least two meanings. Often these meanings are exact opposites. Here are a few examples: Axiom of science Meaning #1: a principle that has been proven, by observation and experience, beyond a reasonable doubt. Examples: Second Law of Thermodynamics, Inverse Square Law of Gravity. Meaning #2: an assumption or made up story, that is, a fabrication, which is accepted on make...

Why Do Evolutionists Resist Reality and Science? Short Answer The reason that evolutionists resist reality and true science is that they are either knowingly or unknowingly being influenced in one of the New Age religions, probably Humanism, Atheism, or Agnosticism, and that influence is making it impossible for them to be objective. Evolution isn\'t science. There is no proof of evolution, and, in fact, there are a growing number of...

Why Are Rationalized Speculations False? Evolution is an alternate story to what God says happened.  God\'s story checks out scientifically if we eliminate the Atheistic assumptions of Atheistic science.  In fact, God\'s story matches what we can observe while the competing story, evolution, does not.  The evolutionists have not even been able to tell an uncheckable lie, but even if they were able to tell such a lie, that would not...

Why Resort To Post-Modernism and Chaos Theory? Short Answer The reason evolution-scientists had to resort to post-modernism and chaos theory is that it was a last-ditch effort to save the debunked hypothesis of evolution. Under post-modernism, there are no absolutes, so observation means nothing. Science is defined to mean whatever the evolution-scientists want it to mean. Under that form of lunacy, people can believe in evolution despite the obvious scientific facts. Evolution...

Evolution\'s Cultic Dogma   Here is a quick explanation of why evolution is religious dogma of many cults and it is not science. EVOLUTION IS A SERIES OF BROKEN ARGUMENTS A common tactic of Evolutionists is to stack one bogus argument on top of another and continue this process hoping to bury you in the debris. On examining each argument, you find that not one of them has any value. Since they have no...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Evolution is NOT Science Many...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. While this page may be interesting to some people, it is really not necessary to become a scientist to know that God created everything just the way that He said He did and in the time frame that He said He did. Some people say that evolution and old-Earthism are examples of science. That...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Second Law of Theromdynamics Makes Evolution Impossible You have probably heard of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Do you understand it? It\'s not to hard to understand. If you paint a fence white, after a few years, the paint is looking pretty bad. That\'s what the Second Law of Thermodynamics is all about. The Evolutionists...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Obvious: Information, Complexity, and Order Do not Happen by Chance   Both the Bible and science agree: God created the heavens and the earth. Every single method of testing the age of the earth is based on circular reasoning. In other words, you need to know the age you want it to be before you...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Spontaneous Ordering/Separating As Opposed to Complexifying or Adding Information Spontaneous ordering or separating has nothing to do with complexifying or adding information. There are many natural examples of spontaneous ordering. Adding raw energy to water can make steam separate, but that adds no complexity or information to the water. Evolutionists say that adding raw...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Theory of Evolution (it\'s really just a model, not a scientific theory) Conflicts With the Proven Law of Entropy The claim that matter goes from less complex to more complex structures directly conflicts with the observable and proven law of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics. In addition, after many millions of tax dollars spent...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Neanderthal Man You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time. Every time we turn around, the scientists are changing their minds about neanderthal man. They can do this because they have changed the meaning of the word, science. Science used to mean knowledge....

Science and Logic are Limited Tools It is illogical to apply logic past its own limits and then claim that the results make sense. It is unscientific to apply science past its own limits and then claim that the results are valid. Human weakness keeps scientists and theologians from understanding because human minds are sadly lacking in the ability to perceive. The invention of instruments, such as the microscope and telescope, have...

Question: Why is it so difficult for a doctor of philosopher to believe The Holy Bible? I am about to witness to a PhD philosopher. Answer: It\'s important that you realize what your responsibility is and is not. You are responsible to be obedient to the Holy Spirit. You are not responsible to lead this PhD to Christ. The Holy Spirit does that through you if it is to happen. So, you need...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Life has a very...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Has the HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way?     No! Many false claims have been made. Here are the facts. #1 If we had an example of new information being added by a random mutation, by random chance (though we do not have any example of new information being added by random chance, neither...