This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don't get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.

Science has merit. Scientists usually do a good job. However, Evolutionism is not science. Clarification: there is a term, "historical science." The problem is that most people use the word, "science," as if it had the same meaning regardless of context. Google "the science of" and see what you get. Evolution is based on a collection of myths, made up stories. It is not based on real science. Yet, evolutionist try to label the what God reveals through the Bible as if it were a myth. The fact is that evolutionism is a myth and it is based on many other myths. Evolutionists can't even answer these few questions linked here. Any one of those questions being unanswered is proof that evolution is merely a series of cleverly designed fables.

Many scientists have been taught erroneously that Evolutionism is science when it is a proposed story about history, but if they would give it a moment's thought, they would realize that Evolutionism could not possibly be science. It is impossible to test the story without using a time machine. And how would you repeat the test by various teams of scientists? Evolutionists look at data that was derived by scientific method. That, in itself, does not convert Evolutionism into science. Evidence for Evolutionism is lacking, in genetics, palaeontology, sedimentology, dating techniques, geology, biology, and all sciences. Yet Evolutionists declare that all of these sciences not only support Evolutionism but even prove it. This is plainly untrue.

Most scientists are so brainwashed that they would become emotional about that statement, and they could not possibly think objectively about this. Others are open minded, but they may be coerced into professing belief in Evolutionism. They are closet creationists who are afraid of the obvious retribution for heresy against Darwin. The Evolutionistic elite have the power to take away funding and to get people fired from their jobs, so most scientists would be afraid to admit that they are Christians or that they believe in the Creator. Evolutionism is holding on to power by intimidation, fascism, dirty tricks, and deception. The ungodly have an amazingly strong desire to try to eliminate God--as if denial of God would help eliminate the ultimate judgment.

Open minded skeptics change their minds when they are actually able to investigate the facts.  Dishonest Atheists and people who are closed-minded don't what their presuppositions to be challenged.

Evolution is fraud

Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. Evolutionists even continue to use many of the frauds of the past, knowing that they are obvious frauds that have already been debunked. They continue to present stories that are very questionable as if it were fact. They speak about natural selection as though it has a mind and develops designs and executes development of those plans. That is just insane.  When these questionable "facts," are exposed and shown to be false, evolutionists will tend to continue to use them. Sometimes, they will try to justify this with strange "logic" similar to the logic of Dan Rather and the ungodly press: "Well, all my proof has been shown to be dishonest and fraudulent, but what I asserted is still true."  The prominent Atheistic evangelist, Richard Dawkins, stated that Evolution needs no evidence--it is simply true.  Some of the evolutionists have admitted that these frauds and lies are intentional and they try to rationalize various defenses of the deceptive methods and practices. Of course, once the Bible is taken out of the picture, by what standard would it be wrong to lie?

Evolution is not reasonable

This battle is not about someone else's ideas versus our ideas. We need to decide what is a valid thought. This is really the basis of the difference between the two arguments. What authority will govern how we interpret facts. Evolutionists try to say that they are neutral, but they obviously are not. All science and knowledge operates in terms of the world-views and paradigms of the scientists. In other words, there is a religion behind all science, whether that religion is serves the true God, humanity as gods, or some other god. Most evolutionists are working from a basis of a religion such as Secular Humanism or Agnosticism or Atheism or some kind of make-believe Christianity (which is simply a cloak to hide ungodliness).

Scientists who are convinced that the evidence points to Creation by Almighty God on the one side and evolutionists on the other side are looking at the same observations. But they are coming up with different conclusions. Evolutionists assume no God, no flood, no miracles, no spirits, no creation, rejecting all observation that conflicts with these assumptions. Creationists presuppose God, the worldwide flood, miracles, spirits, and creation. Regardless of the presuppositions, the evidence points to the God of the Bible. Those who ignore the overwhelming evidence are without excuse.

Romans 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God has showed it to them. 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: You see? You know because God has showed it to you and to all of us.

In coming to conclusions from the data, something must be added to the data. The thing that is added to the data is either divine revelation or else it is human rationalization. Evolutionists tend to believe in human revelatory powers--rationalization--while creationists tend to believe that God has the ability to reveal, especially through the Bible. Both these tendencies to believe in miraculous revelation have been tested and it can readily be seen that the creationists are correct and the evolutionists are wrong.

The human mind does not have any ability to reveal. And the Bible continues to stand against all attacks. In addition, what can be observed confirms that the Bible is right. The assumptions of Humanism, Atheism, Agnoticism, and imitation Christianity do not line up with what can be observed.

Evolution Is Not Even a Theory

Evolution is not even a theory as the word, theory, is defined by evolutionists. A theory, to an evolutionist, is defined as something that has been proved. There is not a shred of proof for the fairy tale we call "evolution."

Although evolutionists claim to have evidence for evolution, this claim always falls apart under scrutiny.

Evolutionism is increasingly becoming a series of speculative stories to explain away the scientific observations that are evidence of the biblical account of creation of the universe and all life by God.

Evolution is political

Evolutionism stays politically alive by using false claims, claims that are later proven false. By the time one false evolutionistic claim is proven to be false, the evolutionists have developed a new false claim to take its place. Looking back in the history of evolution, you can observe a history of one false claim after another. One of the newest false claims of evolutionism is the concept of junk DNA. If this web page remains in place for a little while, an evolutionist will be saying, "Oh, no one believes in junk DNA." The false claim of junk DNA is as laughable as the evolutionistic argument of vestigial organs was at the time when evolutionists were still using the "vestigial organs" argument. The so called, "pseudogenes" are part of the pseudo-science of pseudo-scientists.

How does the molecules-to-man evolution conjecture / fabrication violate what can be easily observed?

Evolutionism violates many easily observed scientifically proven principles. Evolution isn't science. Two of the most obvious of these scientific laws that evolutionism violates are the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. There are countless additional examples.

The Evolutionists will tell you a half truth about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The Evolutionists will tell the half truth: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies to isolated systems, so it's not relevant to evolution, because the Earth is an open system." This is a clever lie. Here is the part of the truth that they are withholding: the Second Law of Thermodynamics was derived using theoretical isolated systems, but it applies to all systems, and can only be overcome locally and temporarily in open systems when stringent conditions are met. Not only that, but we are not talking about the Earth. The Earth is just a subsystem of a much larger system called the Universe. The Universe is an isolated system. Evolutionists claim that Evolution took place in this isolated system, but the Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that their story is a myth.

More information on the Second Law of Thermodynamics can be found here & here & here & here & here

Why Do Evolutionists Resist Reality and True Science?

The reason that evolutionists resist reality and true science is that they are either knowingly or unknowingly being influenced in one of the New Age religions, probably Humanism, Atheism, or Agnosticism, and that influence is making it impossible for them to be objective. Evolution isn't science.

There is no proof of evolution, and, in fact, there are a growing number of observations that show evolution to be a scientific impossibility. The reason that evolution-scientists are still backing the debunked hypothesis of evolution is that they have a hidden agenda which causes them to be willingly ignorant of the facts. This hidden agenda has to do with a desire to follow ungodliness. They don't want Almighty God, but they either want a god of forces, or humanity as god, or no God at all.

As a result of the effect of their hate for God, evolutionist scientists are willing to accept presuppositions, rationalized fantasies, and faulty logic as if any of these were proof. Their claimed proofs are not proof and will not hold up to any scrutinization. None of the proofs that are claimed by evolutionists are any proof at all. Evolutionists are increasingly drawn to Post Modernism and Chaos Theory. There is a reason for this. Under Post Modernism and Chaos Theory, there is no truth, there are no absolutes, there are no lies, and winning is all that really counts. As a result the evolutionist-scientists have found many ways to misrepresent the facts and have been able to totally deceive some and partially deceive many.

There Is No Compelling Evidence For Evolution

• There is no compelling evidence for evolution. Evolution isn't science. There is no proof.
• That's because evolution is just a wild story. It is simply a story.
• There is no evidence that the earth is old.
• the Fossils appear to be deposited by a worldwide flood several thousand years ago. There are many reasons that they could not have been deposited over millions of years.
• No animal has ever been observed changing into any fundamentally different kind of animal.
• No one has ever observed life spontaneously arising from nonliving matter.
• Matter cannot make itself out of nothing. The First Law of Thermodynamics makes this impossible.
• Matter cannot have always existed. The Second Law of Thermodynamics would take effect and there would be nothing but equally distributed heat energy.

But the basic problem is not that all evolutionists do not understand (though some may really be in ignorance). The real problem is that evolutionists don't want God to exist. They really know that God does exist, but they have chosen to be willingly ignorant of Him and all that He has done. They are without excuse before the Almighty Creator God.

Astronomy

• Astronomy and Astrophysics (evidence for design, big bang problems, dark matter, seeing distant starlight)
• Solar System and Extra-solar planets Q&A (evidence for design, age, the Sun, planets, moons, comets, extra-solar planets)
• Aliens/UFOs (are extra-terrestrial aliens visiting us?)
• Galileo, geocentrism, and Joshua's long day

Bible, God, theology

• Bible (is it the Word of God? How are we to understand it?)
• Genesis (real history or mythology/polemic?)
• God (does God exist? what is He like?)
• Jesus Christ (the 'Son of God'? Why did He die? Resurrection?)
• Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions

Biology (creation vs evolution)

• Origin of life (origin of life theories critiqued, including life-from-space)
• Design features (dozens! ID, biomimetics, 'bad' design, astronomy, irreducible complexity)
• Natural selection (yes, it happens but it is not the same as evolution)
• Mutations (yes, they happen, but they can't change microbes into microbiologists)
• Speciation (yes, it happens, but it is limited to variation within the created kind)
• Genetics ('mitochondrial Eve', ape vs human DNA, gene duplication, genetic engineering, cloning, longevity of patriarchs)
• Information theory (including DNA) (information defined, claimed new information)
• Probabilities (could life arise by chance? What about computer simulations of evolution?)
• Thermodynamics and order (how the laws of thermodynamics contradict Naturalism)
• Vestigial organs (including 'junk' DNA)
• Embryonic recapitulation and similarities (Haeckel's fraudulent concept, plus similarities due to common design)
• Charles Darwin (his religious views, contribution to human suffering, natural selection vs evolution)

Creation: relevance to Christianity, society and science

• Creation: Why It matters
• Death and suffering (Why? Origin of bad things such as poisons, carnivory, Satan)
• Creation compromises (theistic evolution, gap theory, progressive creation, framework, etc.)
• Apologetics defending the faith (proof & presuppositions, New Age, postmodernism, hell)
• Philosophy (logic and faith, proof of God, evolution and materialism)
• Countering the Critics (anti-creationists, 'bad' design, probability, 'proof' for an old earth)
• Bible 'contradictions' and 'errors' (answering attacks on the Bible)
• Communism and Nazism (the evolution connection)
• Science (what is it? Is creation or evolution science?)
• Arguments creationists should NOT use
• Creation Scientists (and other biographies)

Geology, the Flood, the Ice Age and the age of the earth

• Young Age Evidence (astronomy, botany, geology, fossils, caves, coal, glaciology, human history, oceanography)
• Radiometric Dating (radiometric dating problems, flaws, rapid decay? radiohalos)
• Flood (global? fish survival? Black Sea flood? flood legends).
• Noah s Ark (size, construction, stability, feasibility, care for animals, diseases, biogeography)
• Geology (Flood evidences, coal formation, limestone caves, rapid rocks, age of fossils?)
• Plate Tectonics (continental drift and catastrophic plate tectonics)
• Ice Age (post-Flood Ice Age, ice core dating, multiple Ice Ages? mammoths)

History

• Archaeology (archaeology and the Bible, from the Flood to New Testament times)
• History (including biblical chronology, genealogies, origin of deep time beliefs)
• Scopes Trial (What is the truth?)
• Linguistics (languages point to the Tower of Babel, animals talking?)

Paleontology

• Fossils (rapid formation, missing links, living fossils, dino-birds?, whale origins, tetrapods)
• Anthropology (human ancestry, alleged ape-men)
• Dinosaurs (humans coexist with? evidence against millions of years, birds from dinosaurs?
• Mammoths (how they fit with the post-Flood Ice Age)

Topic: Evolutionism

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   What Must One Do To Be An Evolutionist? Short Answer Those who decide to follow a career in Evolutionism, which isn\'t science, must subscribe to a different form of reasoning that allows them to filter out facts they don\'t like and make up \"facts\" that they need. They need to take New Age religion\'s attitude that...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. They lie about Natural Selection, claiming that Natural Selection is Evolution.  Natural Selection...

This battle is not about someone else\'s ideas versus our ideas. We need to decide what is a valid thought. This is really the basis of the difference between the two arguments. What authority will govern how we interpret facts. Evolutionists try to say that they are neutral, but they obviously are not. All science and knowledge operates in terms of the world-views and paradigms of the scientists. In other...

Evolution is not even a theory as the word, theory, is defined by evolutionists. A theory, to an evolutionist, is defined as something that has been proved. There is not a shred of proof for the fairy tale we call \"evolution.\" In fact, evolutionists can\'t even answer the \"15 Questions for Evolutionists\". Although evolutionists claim to have evidence for evolution, this claim always falls apart under scrutiny. Evolutionism is increasingly becoming a...

Evolutionism stays politically alive by using false claims, claims that are later proven false.By the time one false evolutionistic claim is proven to be false, the evolutionists have developed a new false claim to take its place. Looking back in the history of evolution, you can observe a history of one false claim after another. One of the newest false claims of evolutionism is the concept of junk DNA. If...

Evolutionists will often use the word, \"micro-evolution,\" which is an interesting form of equivocation. This equivocation, using the word, \"micro-evolution,\" is a deliberate attempt to deceive. The deceiving term, micro-evolution is used to try to make the student think that two unrelated processes are related. The way this is done is to use the word deceitfully in a way that encompasses both of the unrelated processes. What they are deceitfully...

There is no Compelling Evidence for Evolution   While it would be faulty logic to try to prove that Evolution never happened just because of the amazing lack of evidence for such Evolution, it would also be a lie to claim that there is compelling evidence to believe in Evolution. In fact, there is real compelling scientific evidence against it, and the fact that evolutionists cannot answer the \"15 Questions for Evolutionists.\" There...

Evolution Violates What Can Easily Be Observed   Evolutionism violates many easily observed scientifically proven principles. Evolution isn\'t science. Two of the most obvious of these scientific laws that evolutionism violates are the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. There are countless additional examples. Ungodly people use simple-minded assumptions as filters to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God. ...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Mutation Questions & Answers What is the relationship of extinction to natural selection? Natural Selection Is Not \'Nature\'s Intelligence In a world where science has degenerated into shouting slogans, we hear all types of claims, many of them false.  Natural Selection claims to include the capability for creatures to generate various traits that improve their ability...

According to old-earth theology, the abundant polonium radiohalos found in granite rocks worldwide cannot be exist.  In other words, once again, reality conflicts with evolutionism.   Polonium has a very short half life, which means that the \"millions-of-years\" assumptions of the old-earth theology could not exist.  If the \"millions-of-years\" were actually true, there would be no naturally occurring polonium.  This one fact proves the old-earth to be a fairy tale for...

Evolution and Confusing Words Have you noticed how many important words have at least two meanings. Often these meanings are exact opposites. Here are a few examples: Axiom of science Meaning #1: a principle that has been proven, by observation and experience, beyond a reasonable doubt. Examples: Second Law of Thermodynamics, Inverse Square Law of Gravity. Meaning #2: an assumption or made up story, that is, a fabrication, which is accepted on make...

Why Do Evolutionists Resist Reality and Science? Short Answer The reason that evolutionists resist reality and true science is that they are either knowingly or unknowingly being influenced in one of the New Age religions, probably Humanism, Atheism, or Agnosticism, and that influence is making it impossible for them to be objective. Evolution isn\'t science. There is no proof of evolution, and, in fact, there are a growing number of...

Why Are Rationalized Speculations False? Evolution is an alternate story to what God says happened.  God\'s story checks out scientifically if we eliminate the Atheistic assumptions of Atheistic science.  In fact, God\'s story matches what we can observe while the competing story, evolution, does not.  The evolutionists have not even been able to tell an uncheckable lie, but even if they were able to tell such a lie, that would not...

Why Resort To Post-Modernism and Chaos Theory? Short Answer The reason evolution-scientists had to resort to post-modernism and chaos theory is that it was a last-ditch effort to save the debunked hypothesis of evolution. Under post-modernism, there are no absolutes, so observation means nothing. Science is defined to mean whatever the evolution-scientists want it to mean. Under that form of lunacy, people can believe in evolution despite the obvious scientific facts. Evolution...

Evolution\'s Cultic Dogma   Here is a quick explanation of why evolution is religious dogma of many cults and it is not science. EVOLUTION IS A SERIES OF BROKEN ARGUMENTS A common tactic of Evolutionists is to stack one bogus argument on top of another and continue this process hoping to bury you in the debris. On examining each argument, you find that not one of them has any value. Since they have no...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Evolution is NOT Science Many...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. While this page may be interesting to some people, it is really not necessary to become a scientist to know that God created everything just the way that He said He did and in the time frame that He said He did. Some people say that evolution and old-Earthism are examples of science. That...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Second Law of Theromdynamics Makes Evolution Impossible You have probably heard of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Do you understand it? It\'s not to hard to understand. If you paint a fence white, after a few years, the paint is looking pretty bad. That\'s what the Second Law of Thermodynamics is all about. The Evolutionists...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Obvious: Information, Complexity, and Order Do not Happen by Chance   Both the Bible and science agree: God created the heavens and the earth. Every single method of testing the age of the earth is based on circular reasoning. In other words, you need to know the age you want it to be before you...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Spontaneous Ordering/Separating As Opposed to Complexifying or Adding Information Spontaneous ordering or separating has nothing to do with complexifying or adding information. There are many natural examples of spontaneous ordering. Adding raw energy to water can make steam separate, but that adds no complexity or information to the water. Evolutionists say that adding raw...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   The Theory of Evolution (it\'s really just a model, not a scientific theory) Conflicts With the Proven Law of Entropy The claim that matter goes from less complex to more complex structures directly conflicts with the observable and proven law of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics. In addition, after many millions of tax dollars spent...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Neanderthal Man You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time. Every time we turn around, the scientists are changing their minds about neanderthal man. They can do this because they have changed the meaning of the word, science. Science used to mean knowledge....

Science and Logic are Limited Tools It is illogical to apply logic past its own limits and then claim that the results make sense. It is unscientific to apply science past its own limits and then claim that the results are valid. Human weakness keeps scientists and theologians from understanding because human minds are sadly lacking in the ability to perceive. The invention of instruments, such as the microscope and telescope, have...

Question: Why is it so difficult for a doctor of philosopher to believe The Holy Bible? I am about to witness to a PhD philosopher. Answer: It\'s important that you realize what your responsibility is and is not. You are responsible to be obedient to the Holy Spirit. You are not responsible to lead this PhD to Christ. The Holy Spirit does that through you if it is to happen. So, you need...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Life has a very...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Has the HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way?     No! Many false claims have been made. Here are the facts. #1 If we had an example of new information being added by a random mutation, by random chance (though we do not have any example of new information being added by random chance, neither...

Topic: Deception

A Teacher of logic Takes an Illogical Stand and Will Not Admit It A personal testimony: I heard an acquaintance, a teacher of logic, conversing with some students. The question was, \"Even though it\'s illogical, can we still believe in God?\" The answer the teacher gave was, \"Yes, as long as you remember that it\'s totally illogical to do so.\" This seemed like an odd conversation for several reasons. First, it seemed...

Evolution\'s Cultic Dogma   Here is a quick explanation of why evolution is religious dogma of many cults and it is not science. EVOLUTION IS A SERIES OF BROKEN ARGUMENTS A common tactic of Evolutionists is to stack one bogus argument on top of another and continue this process hoping to bury you in the debris. On examining each argument, you find that not one of them has any value. Since they have no...

Definition of Words Used by Evolutionists Convergence: a desperate effort from evolutionists to keep creatures under the evolutionary umbrella. Evolution: a term used to confuse the public through equivocation. In mid-thought, sometimes in mid-sentence, the skilled Evolutionism evangelist will switch the meaning of the word. The most common method is to start by speaking about the common variations that occur within a kind of animal, say, a dog or a finch. That...

Evolution and Confusing Words Have you noticed how many important words have at least two meanings. Often these meanings are exact opposites. Here are a few examples: Axiom of science Meaning #1: a principle that has been proven, by observation and experience, beyond a reasonable doubt. Examples: Second Law of Thermodynamics, Inverse Square Law of Gravity. Meaning #2: an assumption or made up story, that is, a fabrication, which is accepted on make...

How to Avoid Cults   You must come close to Jesus and get to know Him--this is the only place of safety. There is coming a deception so terrible that it would be impossible to avoid being deceived were it not for this one way. The only way to avoid being deceived is to get to know the real Son of God so well that you can tell when something is not from...

Mark 8:33 But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men. In this Scripture, Satan, the liar, speaks through Peter.  We need to yield our members, especially our tongue and the words of our mouth, to the Holy Spirit.  We can\'t yield both...

Matthew 16:21-23 From that time forth began Jesus to shew to his disciples, how that he must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.  Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be to thee.  But he turned, and said to...

It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Whether the questions you receive are honest, sincere questions or those of an ungodly skeptic is often not known. It would not be surprising that the ungodly would use such reasoning as is found in the formulation of many of these questions. Every person has two voices speaking to them at all times. There...

Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? ...

Science and Logic are Limited Tools It is illogical to apply logic past its own limits and then claim that the results make sense. It is unscientific to apply science past its own limits and then claim that the results are valid. Human weakness keeps scientists and theologians from understanding because human minds are sadly lacking in the ability to perceive. The invention of instruments, such as the microscope and telescope, have...

God\'s way has the Scriptural structure and order and a sure foundation. God is a God of order. He has an opinion on everything, including how the foundation of His Church will be laid. No man can send himself to this work. 2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of...

The apostolic age is an assumption that support the theological position that miracles, tongues, the power of God, apostles, prophets, the gifts of the Spirit, the leading of God\'s Spirit, and many other things are no longer available to the church. Duration: Ephesians 4:11-13 The apostles will be here until we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God to a perfect man...

Jeremiah 23:16-22 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not to the words of the prophets that prophesy to you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD. They say still to them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say to every one that walketh after the imagination of his...

We know that the ministries and offices of the Church are counterfeited. Every gift of God, including salvation, is counterfeited. By their fruits shall you know them. The Scriptural order is very plain. The counterfeits: There are many instances where authority is claimed but a man or an organization is glorified. Anyone would know that this is not from God. A friend of mine went to a seminar where anyone who wanted it could purchase...

Big Brother, in the book, 1984, realized that the key to controlling the future was to control history.  He employed and army of editors to edit all historical documents to eliminate any troublesome facts.  Today, there is an army of editors doing similar work.  We often call them "scholars."  As of this writing, this army is using the philosophy called "Post Modernism" to justify their re-writing of history.  Their work...

This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don\'t get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Fraud is being committed repeatedly by the evolutionists. They lie about Natural Selection, claiming that Natural Selection is Evolution.  Natural Selection...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Has the HIV Virus Demonstrated Evolution In Any Way?     No! Many false claims have been made. Here are the facts. #1 If we had an example of new information being added by a random mutation, by random chance (though we do not have any example of new information being added by random chance, neither...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Comment: An anonymous commenter writes: \"It is interesting that you say that research done by others is \'lies, creative stories, loopy logic, and insanity\' however you do not support any of your statements with evidence. Debate is essential to maintain a high quality of research in society however you must support your claims. As I am...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. And don\'t forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Comment: \"... I would recommend you read Exodus 21:1-11 where the God of the Bible allows slavery, including selling your...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. And don\'t forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Comment: \"... read about god supported child abuse in Judges 11:29-40...\" Answer: (Read the article that prompted this comment HERE) (See the entire...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. And don\'t forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Anti-Bible, Anti-God Comment: \"...and Isaiah 13:16 which extends to bashing babies against rocks in Hosea 13:16 & Psalm 137:9.\" (Read the...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.   Ages of Time + Impossibility     Many Christians have lost their faith because of ungodly speculations regarding the age of the Earth. They listen to those who speak out of the human mind rather than the mind of God and the ungodly speculations that put death before sin, eliminate the world-wide flood and replace...

It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. Everything that we believe either goes back to the Rock, Jesus, or else it goes to the sand, axioms. Axioms are just assumptions. They are deeply rooted assumptions. Axioms are made up and they are believed because they are believed. Even those who are most dedicated to logic as the only way to truth,...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. Question: I have been in a debate with an atheist for months now. They will not stick to the issues because I disprove them and they just keep slandering, lying, name calling and trying to categorize me. I don\'t mind a good debate--matter of fact I love it, but only when both parties stick to...

If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this. The points on this page may shake the faith of the Atheist in the precepts of Atheism, but the most important thing is that you share the Good News (Gospel). This is simple. All these other things may help, but it is the proclamation of the Gospel that transforms minds. See Give Them the...