Empirical Evidence

Evolutionists are forced to hold on tightly to some basic presuppositions.  These presuppositions are just simple-minded assumptions.  They are filters and a way to censor out any information that supports the existence of God.  They set up a web of rules to filter out God.  They will only accept those things that conform to Naturalism, Materialism, and Uniformitarianism.  Naturalism claims that God does nothing.  Materialism claims that there is no God or spiritual realm.  Uniformitarianism claims that there was not creation and that there was no violent worldwide flood, as the Bible and numerous other historical accounts record.  Whatever they observe that does not conform to this complex filter is censored.  The way that it is censored can take several forms.  Evolutionists may boldly proclaim that, though the data appears to support design and refute Evolution, yet it still must be interpreted to mean just the opposite of what it does mean.  A backup method that Evolutionists use is to prophecy that in the future, science will be able to explain what they see as an anomaly.  If that fails, they will hide the data, set it aside, or lie to keep the public from knowing the truth.  The reality is that these people, for whatever reason, don't what to know the Creator.  They don't want to truly know Jesus, their Creator.

Evolution isn't science. 

Well, a lot of things are called science, but Evolution is observable using science in the same sense that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is observable using science.  It is historical science, but the word, science, has a different meaning in this case.  Of course, there are some honest scientists, and there are some scientists who are honest some of the time. Note the quotes below:  
 
Astronomer Professor Herman Bondi wrote: "Theories of the origin of the universe have been disproved by present day empirical evidence as have various theories of the origin of the solar system."  
 
Astronomer Professor Harold Jeffreys wrote: "All suggested accounts of the origin of the solar system are subject to serious objections. The conclusion in the present state of the subject would be that the system cannot exist."  
 
Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner, wrote: "All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we feel that it is too complex to have evolved anywhere."  
 
In another place, Urey wrote, "We believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just that its complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did." Evolution and Fanaticism  
 
It's just hard to believe that rocks turn into people over a period of time. It's hard to believe that all those energy particles formed themselves, gave themselves energy, and organized themselves into atoms. These types of Secular Humanistic stories make the Santa Clause and Easter Bunny stories sound very believable in comparison.

Evolution isn't science.

"15 Questions for Evolutionists"