|Natural Selection And Mutation|
This page is provided to answer a specific question, but don't get tied up in detail and forget where you are going. You get past the questions/attacks so you can proclaim the Gospel. It is the proclamation of the Gospel, not argumentation, that transforms minds. See Give Them the Gospel. If you have not read Stories Versus Truth, you may want to read that before reading this.
Evolutionists claim that Natural Selection and mutation have the power to Evolve ever more complex creatures with more organization and information in their cells. Is there any truth to that claim?
The four assumptions of the notion that Natural Selection could drive Evolution from molecules to man:
The problems with Natural Selection:
(Read the latest science on the subject: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information. See also: Information Theory Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4. Here is another interesting article.) More is constantly being learned about information and about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Evolutionists tend to hide in the weeds of the unknown with an argument from ignorance: "If you can't prove, by empirical science, that evolution is impossible, then it happened." By empirical science alone, we can only prove probabilities. The probabilities show the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story to be a bazaar hypothesis, a story that is so improbable that it should not be considered. However, empirical science is not a tool that can prove anything to be true or false absolutely. For absolute proof, we have revelation. (See Basic and Concise Guide to Practical, Useful Logic and Reasoning). God says that He created everything. He is the One Who enforces the laws of nature. He is the One Who will judge all of us in the end. We know that because we know Him presonally through the indwelling Presence of Jesus Christ and the moment-by-moment instruction of the Holy Spirit.
"A designer's approach to explain adaptation differs from an evolutionary biologist's approach. The differences are evident when you flip things around and force designers to explain design performance using evolutionary language. How long would NASA's lead engineer keep his job if he explained to the President that the reason for the heart-wrenching loss of space shuttles Challenger and Columbia was due to "strong negative selection," while the Endeavor was favored by "strong positive selection"? In the world of design, would anyone tolerate mystical explanations like that? No." ~ source: Engineered Adaptability
The Information problem:
New innovative genetic information of the type needed for even the smallest advance in so-called molecules-to-man evolution would need to be generated by natural means. It never happens.
The following chart makes it plain that every instance of supposed increase of information that is used by Evolution's evangelists is an example of NO increase in information. Evolutionist's claims for adding information fall into three categories. These are the 3 Rs of Evolution: Rearrange information, Remove information, and Ruin information. See: The 3 Rs of evolution
Using an analogy of a train, Evolution hopes to go from Missouri in Central U.S. to California. However, the train is going the wrong direction toward New York, with each small change being the result of a loss of information or simply a rearrangement of what is already there. The evolution train’s a-comin’
When faced with this dilemma, the dogmatic evolutionist will often be surprised that new, innovative information would have had to have been added to the cell for even the smallest step of evolution between kinds (not species, but kinds, for example, the dog kind: wolves, coyotes, spaniels; or the cat kind: lions, tigers, Siamese). So you may hear them say that they don't know what you are talking about. The more informed will insist that information is added. They will bring up one example after another of loss of information. They may say that since cell duplication takes place any change to either cell is an increase in information. That is not true. (read more) No increase in information has ever been observed. There are no examples of information being added to a cell by natural processes. Information only comes from information. See: Without Excuse by Werner Gitt, a description of the scientific Laws of Universal Information.
Last updated: Nov, 2013
Natural Selection Has No Method for Adding New Information
Natual Selection is Fraud
An Increase in Information Through Natural Selection Has NEVER Been Observed
Natural Selection Is Impossible to Test Scientifically
Toons & Vids
Is Creation science or religion? Is Evolution science or religion?
Evolution Berkeley: Evolution 101
Claim: Evolution Has Been Observed!!! Really????
Ask them for Proof that Molecules-To-Man Evolution Actually Happened
Arguments Against Evolution
Twelve Arguments Evolutionists Should Avoid
The Most Amazing Thing That I Found Out About What The Schools Are Calling
The Problems with Evolution: What are the Problems with the Molecules-to-Man Evolution Fabrication
Unanswered Evolution Questions
Evolutionists Refuse To Follow The Evidence Where The Evidence Leads Because The Evidence Leads To God.
Ptolemy's Geocentric System of the Universe and Evolution
Can You Show Evidence For Creation By Almighty God From Nothing
Is the Creator Obvious? Stare at this picture for 60 seconds. A giraffe will appear.
Natural Selection And Mutation
Evolution is Flim-flam
Evolution Obviously Violates The Revealed Word Of God
What Is Wrong With Theistic Evolution?
Unproven And Unbelievable Evolution
Does the Founder Principle Support Evolution?
Birds to Dinosaurs?
Claim: Evolutionists Claim That Similar Features In Fossilized Skeletons Prove Evolution. Question: Is There Any Truth To This Claim?
If you explain that everything exists because God created it, you still have not explained anything.
The Cult, Evolutionism
Answers: Natural Selection and Mutation
Evolutionist Tactics Raise Serious Questions
How could there be a science that is based on nothing but a whim?
Why should evolutionism be called a fairytale rather than a theory?
Question & Answer: Butterfly Evolves Mouth for Bananas?
Links And Technical Information
Answer to Critic
Appeal to Possibility
Argument to the Future
Love Between a Man and Woman
Righteousness & Holiness
Proof by Atheism
Scriptures About Marriage
The Reason for Rejecting Truth
Witness on the Internet
Flaky Human Reasoning
How Do You Know?
The Real Purpose of the Church
The Real Purpose of Life
From Glory to Glory
REAL Faith--What it IS & IS NOT
REAL Love--What it IS & IS NOT
How to be Led by God
How to Witness
Wisdom: Righteousness & Reality
Holiness & Mind/Soul
Redemption: Free From Sin
Stories Versus Revelation
Circular Reasoning-Who is Guilty?
How Can We Know Anything?
Mind Designed to Relate to God
Answers for the Confused
Fossil Record Says: "Creation"
Avoid These Pitfalls
Public School's Religion
Public School Failures