| Essentializing Fallacy |
Essentializing FallacyThe essentializing fallacy is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought (without Divine revelation) is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regress, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Some have claimed that only logic and math can be known without Divine revelation; however, that is not true. There is no reason to trust either logic or math without Divine revelation. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. The Essentializing Fallacy occurs when it is assumed that whatever now is has always been this way and will always be this way. Examples of the Essentializing Fallacy
There is no way to test a statement like that. We have no clue. God has not revealed it, unless the person saying this is claiming to have had a vision of some sort. Will the spiritual bodies we will receive in the Kingdom of Heaven need the Second Law of Thermodynamics to function? If so, how can we know such thing? The philosophy (used in Secular Humanist science) of Uniformitarianism 
How can we know anything about anything? That’s the real question |
Other Pages in this sectionFlat Earth Jingoism Chronological Snobbery Retrospective Determinism Presentism Appeal to Naturalism Appeal to Materialism Proof by Uniformitarianism Proof by Agnosticism Proof by Atheism Escape to Relativism Appeal to Rationalism \"If God Exists\" Scientism Finish the Job Sunk Cost Fallacy Political Correctness Just World Hypothesis Recently Viewed |
