The Logical Fallacy of Self-Exclusion occurs when rules, logic, standards of truth, etc. apply to other points of view but not one’s own. This is a form of special pleading.
Sandy: “Show me the evidence that Jesus Christ speaks to you and tells you that the history in the Bible is accurate.”
Rocky: “Let’s discuss this and you can also show me the evidence that the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story actually happened. Christ speaks through the physical evidence for the Creation and Flood, and it is the same physical evidence that assumption and storytelling attributes to the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story. As far as showing you evidence that Christ is guiding me, this is similar to me asking you to prove to me that you don’t believe in the existence of God. Prove to me that you really don’t believe and you aren’t just refusing to acknowledge Him. However, you can verify Christ’s existence since everyone who sincerely continues to seek Him will eventually receive His leading and guiding. Some people don’t want this because they like things that aren’t good. So that’s my evidence in condensed form. Now, show me your evidence that the Big-Bang-Billions-of-Years-No-Flood-Molecules-to-Man story actually happened."
Sandy: “I don’t have to show you anything. The burden of proof is on you because the existence of God is an extraordinary claim.”
Sandra: “There are no absolutes.”
Roxanne: “Are you absolutely certain of that?”
Sandra: “No; I mean that nothing can be absolutely known, right?”
Roxanne: “So you are saying that your statement can’t be absolutely known?”
Sandra: “That’s not what I mean. I mean that there is no way to know whether something is right or wrong or true or false.”
Roxanne: “Are you saying that you can’t know whether what you just said is right or wrong or true or false.”
Sandra: “I see the problem.”